8 |
Assessment of Effects of Chemicals on Wetlands |
| William H. Queen and Donald W. Stanley | |
| East Carolina University, USA |
| 8.1. INTRODUCTION | ||
| 8.2 METHODS FOR STUDYING PLANTS AND ANIMALS | ||
| 8.2.1 BIOACCUMULATION DETERMINATIONS | ||
| 8.2.2 EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES | ||
| 8.3 METHODS TO STUDY THE EFFECTS OF CHEMICALS ON THE SYSTEM ITSELF | ||
| 8.3.1 INVENTORIES | ||
| 8.3.2 CHEMICAL LOADINGS AND MASS BALANCE DETERMINATIONS | ||
| 8.3.3 MODELLING | ||
| 8.4 MONITORING | ||
| 8.4.1 ABIOTIC MONITORING | ||
| 8.4.2 BIOMONITORING | ||
| 8.5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | ||
| 8.6 REFERENCES | ||
|
|
||
From the late 1950s, scientific studies have conclusively shown that wetlands contribute substantially to human health and welfare. Specifically, wetlands have been shown to improve water quality, provide food for commercially and recreationally important fish and shellfish living in nearby water bodies, serve as critical habitat for numerous species of wildlife, reduce shoreline erosion, and act as flood control devices (Hemond and Benoit, 1988). As important functions of wetlands were being identified, data were also being assembled that suggested that wetlands were being lost or degraded at alarming rates by either development or chemical pollution (Mitsch and Gosselink, 1986). These data raised questions in both the scientific and environmental management communities about which wetlands are most valuable, current rates of wetland loss or degradation, and the effects of chemical pollutants on wetland characteristics and functions. These and similar questions have been difficult to answer, because wetlands differ enormously in terms of their basic characteristics (i.e., vegetation type, soil type, areal extent, spatial configuration, hydrology), their geographical distribution, and their abundance in different state or provincial or regional watersheds.
Unlike changes resulting from development projects that are easily detected, adverse chemical impacts on wetlands are especially difficult to detect and evaluate. First, wetlands can be damaged by a variety of substances (e.g., high nutrient concentrations, heavy metals, and a vast array of organic compounds). Second, these chemicals may reach wetlands as a result of either point or non-point source discharge, and they may be transported by either water or air from nearby or distant discharge points. Third, negative impacts of particular chemical pollutants may be limited to the wetland vegetation or to specific faunal species. Fourth, chemical pollutants in wetlands often cause chronic rather than acute problems for the affected organisms, making detection far more difficult. Other factors may further complicate the chemical impact picture. For example, chemical pollutants are often released at very irregular intervals, and, therefore, may move to a wetland site, adversely affect wetland organisms, and not be detected even with a sensitive monitoring program in place.
For these and other reasons, considerable attention over the past few decades has been given to the development and improvement of methodologies to assess the effects of chemicals on both plants and animals and on entire wetland systems. As a result, an array of methodologies is now available. These methodologies are summarized in Table 8.1.
Table 8.1. Methods to assess the effects of chemicals on wetlands
|
|
|
| Method | Application |
|
Plant and animal methods |
|
| Bioaccumulation methods | Assess toxicity of specific chemicals to |
| individual species | |
| Fertilization and sewage addition | Assess capacity of wetlands to remove (field |
| experiments) nutrients from sewage, and impact | |
| of fertilization on wetland system | |
| Microcosm/mesocosm | Provide controlled experiment (laboratory |
| experiments) conditions for testing nutrient and | |
| toxics additions | |
|
System methods |
|
| Inventories | Identify threatened wetlands and the threatening |
| pollutants | |
| Chemical loadings and | Quantify degree of threat, |
| mass balance determinations | assess relative importance of sources, and |
| compare different wetlands | |
| Modelling | |
| energy/nutrient models | Track energy flow through or nutrient cycling |
| within wetland ecosystem | |
| Hydrodynamic models | Simulate pollutant transport through wetlands |
| spatial ecosystem models | Combination of ecosystem and hydrodynamic |
| transport models | |
| Process models | Analyse individual wetlands functions |
|
Monitoring |
|
| Abiotic monitoring | Track changes in chemical concentrations and |
| provide data for interpreting biomonitoring | |
| results | |
| Biomonitoring | Detect impacts from many sources and integrate |
| intermittent stressor effects | |
|
|
|
The discussion of these methodologies begins with a review of those that are routinely employed in bioaccumulation and experimental studies that are undertaken to evaluate the effects of chemicals on wetland plants and animals. Then attention is devoted to the chemical loading and modelling methodologies being developed to determine the effects of chemicals on wetland systems. Finally. wetland monitoring is discussed.
For the past three decades. water quality functions of wetlands have been a major concern of wetland scientists. Among these functions are their capacity to remove or transform excess nutrients. organic compounds. trace metals. sediment. and refrattory chemicals from water as it moves downstream (Hemond and Benoit. 1988). In addressing questions related to these water quality functions. wetland scientists have: (1) developed sophisticated protocols for collecting samples. (2) refined methodologies for both field and laboratory experiments as well as methodologies to analyse biological materials. and (3) developed mathematical models for water quality studies. Those specifically applicable to studying wetland plants and animals are discussed in terms of either bioaccumulation determinations or experimental studies.
8.2.1 BIOACCUMULATION DETERMINATIONS
Measurement of chemical accumulation in tissues of organisms (bioaccumulation) is a methodology widely used to assess contamination in aquatic ecosystems. Bioaccumulation is assessed in the laboratory by first exposing organisms to a chemical. mixed in water or sediments. and then measuring the concentration of the chemical in the tissues (body burden) as a function of the duration of the exposure. The results may be expressed as a bioaccumulation rate¾the rate at which the body burden increases¾or a bioaccumulation factor¾the unitless quotient of the equilibrium body burden divided by the average exposure concentration. A fairly large number of bioaccumulation studies have been reported in the literature. including works by Anthony and Kozlowski (1982). Aulio (1980). Behan et al. (1979). Larsen and Schierup (1981). McIntosh et al. (1978). Mouvet (1985). Niethamner et al. (1985). Schierup and Larsen (1981). and Taylor and Crowder (1983).
Laboratory measurements of bioaccumulation permit chemicals to be tested one at a time. Another attractive attribute of this methodology is that it is not as affected by short-term fluctuations in contaminant levels as are measurements of sediment and particularly water-column concentrations of the chemicals. Longer-lived organisms integrate exposure levels over longer periods of time. so selection of a species, or age class, can influence results. Aquatic macrophytes, macroinvertebrates, amphibians. bird eggs. and small mammals may be preferable for detecting short-term exposures, whereas woody plants. fish. turtles, large adult birds, and for-bearing mammals may be better for monitoring long-term exposure (Leibowitz et al., 1991).
The two major drawbacks to bioaccumulation studies are cost and the difficulty of quantitative interpretation of the results. Interpretation is difficult because variability in tissue residues can be high, even within a species, because they are affected by many factors, including age, tissue type, diet, season, and the length of exposure. Therefore, a sufficient number of individuals from each sampling location has to be collected to overcome the limitation imposed by this variability. This requirement is regrettable, because tissue contaminant levels are costly to measure, especially if analyses are made for more than a few of the wide array of contaminants present in some environments (Leibowitz et al., 1991). Even more serious, however, is the difficulty of evaluating the consequence of a measured body burden to the individual organism, the population of which it is a part, or the higher trophic level consumers that feed on it. The problem is that few studies have attempted to correlate body burden with adverse effects on the organism, or to determine the elimination rates of accumulated chemicals from tissues upon cessation of exposure. Therefore, the longevity of the body burden and any associated harmful effects are unknown.
8.2.2 EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES
Experimental studies of the impacts of chemicals on wetlands have been conducted in the field and in laboratories, greenhouses, microcosms, and mesocosms. Most of these studies have emphasized nutrients, but some have been directed at heavy metals. Salt marsh plants, especially Spartina and Juncus, have been used frequently in experimental research projects.
Numerous field experiments to identify the effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on North American salt marshes (Chalmers, 1982; Morris, 1991) have been conducted. Typically, plots ranging in size from <1.0 m2 to 100 m2 were established in Spartina or Juncus dominated communities. A few plots were used as controls, while the others were enriched with various levels of inorganic fertilizer materials in a single application at the beginning of the growing season, or at weekly or monthly intervals. Response to the fertilization was often measured by calculating net primary productivity from changes in standing biomass. Examples of studies of this type include those of Tyler (1967), Valiela and Teal (1974), Mendelssohn (1979), de la Cruz et al. (1981), and Morris (1988). This procedure was modified by Patrick and DeLaune (1976) and Buresh et al. (1980) with the use of 15N-depleted nitrogen to permit differentiation between soil-derived and fertilizer- derived nitrogen in plant shoots. Van Raalte et al. (1976) and Sullivan (1981) investigated the effects of nitrogen enrichment on salt marsh diatom communities. Wetland nutrient addition experiments have also been made in North American arctic tundra (Shaver and Chapin, 1980), in European fens and wet grasslands (Vermer, 1986), and in wet heathlands in the Netherlands (Aerts and Berendse, 1988). Several laboratory studies have been made to test the influence of nitrogen levels on the growth response of Spartina alterniflora (Haines and Dunn, 1976; Linthurst and Seneca, 1981) and on species of Jungus, Littorella, and Sphagnum (Roelofs et al., 1984). Response was measured by following changes: in plant height, total dry weight, rhizome length and weight, and root weight.
Research on the capacity of wetlands to remove nutrients and other chemicals from wastewater has used nutrient enrichment experiments carried out in the field (Godfrey et al., 1985; Nichols, 1983). The most complete study of the effects of sewage on a salt marsh is the multiyear study by Valiela and Teal in Massachusetts, US, in which they made biweekly additions of a commercial fertilizer made from sewage sludge (Valiela and Teal, 1974; Valiela et al., 1975, 1976, 1985). Similar studies were conducted by Chalmers (1979) and Haines (1979). Sewage treatment capacity has also been studied in several freshwater wetland types (Sloey et al. , 1978; Nichols, 1983; Fetter et al.. 1978; and Bayley et al., 1985). The retention of nutrients and heavy metals by a tidal freshwater wetland receiving urban stormwater runoff was estimated by comparing inputs with outputs (Simpson et al., 1983). Lan et al. (1992) described the use of a pond with cattails (Typha latifolia) for treating wastewater from a lead and zinc mine in China.
The uses of laboratory microcosms and mesocosms for marine and freshwater ecosystem research have been described in volumes edited by Giesy (1980) and Grice and Reeve (1982), and a few wetland systems studies have been reported that made use of these enclosures (Kitchens, 1979; Portier and Meyers, 1982). The flume approach was used by Windom (1977) in Georgia to measure the uptake by the marsh of nutrients and heavy metals contained in effluent from dredged material disposal. For the most part, however, wetlands work has emphasized greenhouse- type studies in which various kinds of plants have been grown in different soils under varying conditions. For example, in a greenhouse experiment designed to differentiate between acid and nitrogen effects, mixtures of different wetland plant species were exposed to simulated rain containing various combinations of inorganic sulphur and nitrogen (Schuurkes et al., 1986). Manipulations and additions involving complete portions of wetlands with sediments, many plants and animal species, and water flows have been rare (Nixon and Lee, 1986).
8.3.1 INVENTORIES
Development of methodologies to address the broader issue of the toxicity of chemicals on wetland systems should begin with the realization that all wetland-organisms, processes, and functions cannot be studied, or even monitored, on a regular basis for even a single chemical, much less for the vast array of chemical pollutants found in wetlands. Hence, a major problem for both the wetland scientific and management communities is that of selecting those wetland sites that should be studied (i.e., monitored), and the specific chemical pollutants that should receive special attention in regulatory , monitoring, and research programmes. The resolution of this important problem requires comprehensive inventories of both - wetlands and the sources of potential chemical pollutants. Moreover, these inventories need to be prepared on both national and local scales (i.e., city or county jurisdiction, watershed, state or province).
The national perspective is essential for several reasons. First, wetlands are an important natural resource for many nations, and issues concerning them are issues of national interest. Second, funding for either wetlands protection or control of chemical discharges that adversely impact wetlands is generally provided by national governments. Hence, these funds should be used to: (I) protect a nation's most valuable wetlands and (2) control those chemical discharges that are most threatening to their health. The local inventories are essential, because most public decisions involving wetlands focus on specific wetland sites and on particular developmental activities or chemical discharges that threaten the specific sites. The following summarizes the essential features and considerations concerning preparation of the four inventories:
National wetlands inventories. A national inventory should show the distribution of all wetlands by location, type, and areal extent; and data on wetland loss over time should be included if available (Office of Technology Assessment; OTA, 1984; Turner et al., 1981; Gosselink and Baumann, 1980; Tiner 1984). Assembly of the national wetland inventories should be based on the local wetland inventories described below.
Local wetlands inventories. Local wetland inventories should be developed in conformance with national guideline, and should be used to assemble the national inventory of wetlands. Local inventories should contain information in much greater detail than the national inventories, because the local inventories can be used for site-specific decisions on wetland development projects.
National inventories of sources of potential chemical pollutants. This inventory should identify both point and non-point sources of chemical pollution (Pait et al., 1992; Quinn et al., 1989). Data on nutrients, heavy metals, and organic compounds should be included. The inventory should be assembled from data contained in the local inventories.
Local inventories of sources of potential chemical pollutants. The local inventories should be developed according to national guidelines, and the information collected used to assemble the national inventory on sources of chemical pollution. Like the national inventory, the local inventories should also contain data on nutrients, heavy metals, and organic compounds.
These inventories by themselves will not establish the adverse impacts of chemical pollutants on wetland systems. They can, however, be used to: (1) identify the wetlands within a system that may be threatened by chemical pollutants, (2) identify the threatening pollutant(s), (3) permit generalization to be made about the severity of the threat, and (4) suggest specific wetland sites and particular chemicals for subsequent studies designed to evaluate specific threats.
8.3.2 CHEMICAL LOADINGS AND MASS BALANCE DETERMINATIONS
Once specific wetland sites and chemical pollutants are selected for study, chemical loading estimates can be developed as indicators of the degree to which the wetland is threatened by toxicity or eutrophication. Loading data can also be used to assess the relative importance of various chemical sources (point and non-point) (Stanley, 1992) and to compare loadings among wetlands. By combining loading data with export values, a chemical budget or mass balance for the wetland can be generated. Although difficult and, therefore, costly to obtain in most situations, mass balances provide a measure of the capacity of wetlands to perform their normal water quality functions (e.g., immobilization of toxic pollutants, plant nutrient removal, removal of biological oxygen demand) (Hemond and Benoit, 1988). Anyone interested in the mass balance approach should consult the excellent review by Nixon and Lee (1986). Although this review is limited to the US literature, it provides a critical assessment of all research between 1970 and 1985 on the role of wetlands as sources, sinks, and transformers of nutrients and heavy metals. The authors cite hundreds of examples of loading and mass balance studies, and argue that developing the ability to predict responses to changes in inputs of these materials depends on a knowledge of the various cycles and flows within the system, and that a mass balance can provide the framework for developing this knowledge. Another useful review by Johnston (1991) references numerous studies of internal nutrient fluxes among wetland compartments.
While conceptually straightforward, a complete budget is difficult to develop because, as Brinson et al. (1980) noted, most wetlands are very open ecosystems by virtue of lateral inflows and outflows during flooding. Thus, obtaining accurate water flow data for the computation of fluxes and mass balances is difficult. Consequently, researchers have frequently resorted to estimating fluxes across wetland boundaries indirectly by measuring various internal storages and flows. The result, concluded Nixon and Lee (1986), is a considerable amount of confusion about whether specific wetland systems act as sources, sinks, or transformers of nutrients, metals, etc., at different times of the year.
8.3.3 MODELLING
Wetland modelling, although relatively new compared to modelling of other types of ecosystems, can also be employed to provide insights into the effects of chemicals on the system itself. Wetland modellers have borrowed from the more developed lake and estuary modelling techniques (Henderson-Sellers, 1984; Straskraba and Gnauck, 1985; Jorgensen, 1988) and from terrestrial models. Reviews of models of freshwater wetlands are summarized by Mitsch et al. (1982, 1988), Mitsch (1983), and Costanza and Sklar (1985).
Several types of models have been developed that incorporate the effects of chemicals on wetland biological structure and processes. Mitsch et al. (1983) summarized this modelling in the following way:
Energy/nutrient ecosystem models. Energy, nutrients, or other materials flow through or cycle among biotic and abiotic components and exchange with the surroundings. These models are often an outgrowth of chemical loadings and mass balance studies, or studies of the ability of wetlands to process wastewaters (Jorgensen, 1988). Examples include a model of energy flow and nutrients in an Everglades marsh system in Florida (US) (Bayley and Odum, 1976), a salt marsh carbon flow model (Wiegert et al., 1981), an energy-nutrient model of water hyacinth (Mitsch, 1976), models for cypress swamps in Florida (Ewel, 1976), a model of hydrology and nutrient cycling in forested wetlands (Mitsch, 1988a, 1988b), models of nutrient retention in a freshwater wetland (Mitsch and Reeder, 1992; Kadlec and Hammer, 1988), and a model dealing with acid mine drainage in a freshwater wetland (Mitsch et al., 1983).
Hydrodynamic transport models. These models, frequently used by engineers for stream flow and runoff calculations, have been applied to simulate wetland hydrology and pollutant transport. Hopkinson and Day (1980) described the application of one of these models (the Storm Water Management Model, SWMM, developed by the USEPA) to predict nutrient dynamics and eutrophication effects in a Louisiana (US) swamp forest resulting from anticipated increases in nutrient loading over a twenty-year period.
Spatial ecosystem models. These models combine features of ecosystem models with hydrodynamic transport models. The entire ecosystem is separated into discrete blocks or nodes, with each node having the characteristics of an ecosystem model. The nodes are connected by hydrodynamic processes. A suite of spatial models has been used to investigate various consequences associated with using freshwater wetlands for disposal of treated sewage (Kadlec and Tilton, 1979).
Process models. This type of model emphasizes individual processes, such as photosynthesis and nutrient cycling processes, rather than emphasizing interactions among compartments as in ecosystem models. Among the relatively few wetland examples of this model type are process models of primary production and vascular plant growth for wet arctic tundra (Miller et al., 1976, 1978a; 1978b; Stanley 1976).
8.4.1 ABIOTIC MONITORING
Programs designed to monitor chemicals in aquatic ecosystems have as their primary goal the identification of long-term trends in the quality of water and sediments of these systems. These programs also have secondary goals that include the provision of data for interpreting the results of other approaches, such as biomonitoring studies. In addition, monitoring is required to estimate chemical loadings and mass balances, and to validate wetland process models. However , field monitoring is inherently retrospective, allowing effects of an activity to be observed, but not predicted. Many works provide information on strategies and practices for environmental monitoring. One of the best is by the National Research Council (NRC, 1990). In addition, a USEPA Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program report is entitled Research Plan for Monitoring Wetland Ecosystems (Leibowitz et al., 1991).
Wetlands pose unusual challenges for monitoring programs. As transitional areas, they are located between uplands and deep water areas. Thus, they exhibit extreme spatial and temporal variability, which requires the collection of many samples for adequate characterization of the wetland. Only a minority of wetlands have permanent surface water, so access may be difficult, and sampling techniques developed for other surface waters are not always applicable. In some cases, downstream sampling may provide appropriate spatial averaging. Unless a relatively frequent sampling protocol can be followed, sampling for chemical contaminants in sediments should provide more consistent results than samples from the water column.
Several standard chemical measurement techniques developed for water and upland soil samples (American Public Health Association, 1989; USEPA, 1979; Parsons et al., 1984; Black, 1965) have been adapted for use in wetlands. Wetland pore waters are often anoxic, so that substantial chemical changes may occur between sampling and analysis if water samples are not rigorously protected. For example, oxidation can cause iron to precipitate and adsorb transition metals, while sulphide may oxidize and release metals. Also, high concentrations of humic substances in wetland surface and pore waters interfere with the chemistry of many standard analyses; nitrate and sulphate are prime examples in this regard. Apparently, no compilation or critical evaluation of chemical analytical methods used in wetlands has been produced (Hemond and Benoit, 1988).
8.4.2 BIOMONITORING
A growing body of literature exists which suggests that monitoring of biological - community structures provides cost-effective diagnostic information about the health of ecosystems. Biological monitoring (or biomonitoring) (1) directly addresses the result of pollution, not its cause, (2) integrates intermittent stressor conditions, and (3) can detect impacts from many sources for which chemical criteria are poorly developed. If biomonitoring suggests that a chemical stress is occurring, then traditional methods (e.g., field monitoring of chemicals, toxicity testing) can be used to help determine the cause(s).
Adamas and Brandt (1990) have prepared a valuable synopsis of the uses of biomonitoring to measure responses to chemicals and other anthropogenic stresses in wetlands. This USEPA-sponsored report first describes general considerations in the design of wetlands biomonitoring studies. Then, for each major taxonomic group (e.g., algae, herbaceous vegetation, birds, fishes), the authors discuss the group's responses to various stressors, and the sampling protocols and equipment appropriate for monitoring those responses. The following general considerations are discussed in the report:
Monitoring of multiple indicators¾having both short and long lifespans, and both localized and broad ranges¾is necessary, because some chemical effects may be brief (e.g., biodegradable pesticides), while others occur over long time periods (e.g., bioaccumulation of metals).
The choice of species to be used as indicators must take into account both policy and scientific considerations. Many of the scientific criteria point to the use of so-called keystone species, which physically alter the landscape so profoundly that they create or destroy habitat for a much larger group of species over a wide area. Examples of wetland keystone animals include beavers, muskrats, alligators, and some herbivorous birds. However, the choice of indicator species is an unsettled issue; some researchers point out that changes in community-level measures give a clearer indication of chemical stress than does the presence or absence of a single indicator species, regardless of its reputation as a keystone (Browder, 1988; Karr, 1987; Kelley and Harwell, 1989).
A wide range of qualitative and quantitative biological sampling methods is available. Qualitative methods include the use of chronological vegetation maps to identify changes in plant composition, species lists and estimates of the presence or absence of indicator species, and the Habitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP) and the Wetland Evaluation Technique (WET), that do not directly measure biological communities but assume biological community structure or wetland function using information on habitat structure (Schroeder, 1987). Quantitative methods are detailed in the Adamus and Brandt (1990) report and in Erwin (1989), Hellawell (1986), Welcomme (1979), and Woods (1975).
Data analysis and interpretation involve the selection of appropriate measures (e.g., abundance, biomass, species richness, and similarity indices). To optimize detection of impacts, several procedures should be used in combination (Schindler, 1987). The utility and sensitivity of some procedures may vary by wetland type. For example, those that depend on species-level data (richness, ordination, and similarity indices) may be ineffective at describing the condition of wetlands that characteristically have low species richness (e.g., breeding bird richness in salt marshes and fish richness in montane wetlands).
For the past three decades, wetland scientists have developed a wide array of methodologies to study the effects of chemicals on wetland organisms, processes, and functions. These methodologies include sampling protocols, field and laboratory experimental methods, and mathematical models. Use of these methodologies has greatly enhanced understanding of impacts of particular chemicals on wetland plants and animals. These methodologies to study plants and animals are now being coupled with information collected in inventories of wetlands and of chemical pollutant sources to characterize the effects of chemicals on wetland systems. Inventories are generally of national and local wetlands, and of national and local sources of chemical pollutants. They are undertaken to identify critical wetlands being threatened by either development projects or chemical pollutants, and to pinpoint pollution sources. The national inventories can also be used to either develop or justify: (1) regulatory restrictions on chemical pollutant discharges that may adversely affect wetlands, (2) the structure and funding of monitoring programs, (3) the allocation of funds for mitigation or restoration activities, and (4) the establishment of chemical pollutant and wetland ecology research priorities. Because most public decisions involving wetlands focus on specific wetland sites, the local inventories can also be used in public policy decisions concerning development projects or chemical discharges that threaten specific wetland sites.
Adamas, P.R., and Brandt, K. (1990) Impacts on Quality of Inland Wetlands of the United States: A Survey of Indicators, Techniques, and Application of Community-Level Biomonitoring Data. Report No. EPA/600/3-90/093. US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon, 396 pp.
Aerts, R. , and Berendse, F. ( 1988) The effect of increased nutrient availability on vegetation dynamics in wet heathlands. Vegetation 76, 63-69.
American Public Health Association. (1989) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 17th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C., 1550 pp.
Anthony, R.G., and Kozlowski, R. (1982) Heavy metals in tissues of small mammals inhabiting waste-water-irrigated habitats. J. Environ. Qual. 11, 20-22.
Aulio, K. (1980) Accumulation of copper in alluvial sediments and yellow water lilies (Nuphar lutea) at varying distances from a metal processing plant. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 25, 713-717.
Bayley, S., and Odum, H.T. (1976) Simulation of interrelations of the Everglades' marsh, peat, fire, water, and phosphorus. Ecol. Modelling 2, 169-188.
Bayley, S.E., Zoltek, Jr, J., Hermann, A.J., Dolan, T.J., and Tortora, L. (1985) Experimental manipulation of nutrients and water in a freshwater marsh: Effects on biomass, decomposition, and nutrient accumulation. Limnol. Oceanogr. 30, 500-512.
Behan, M.J., Kinraide, T.B., and Seiser, W.I. {1979) Lead accumulation in aquatic plants from metallic sources, including shot. J. Wildl. Manage. 43(1), 240-244.
Black, C.A. (Ed.) (1965) Methods of Soil Analysis. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin.
Brinson, M., Bradshaw, H.D., Holmes, R.N., and Elkins, J.B., Jr (1980) Litterfall, stemflow, and throughfall nutrient fluxes in an alluvial swamp forest. Ecology 61, 827-835.
Browder, J.A. (1988) Introduction: aquatic organisms as indicators of environmental pollution. Water Resources Bull. 24(5), 927-929.
Buresh, R.J., DeLaune, R.D., and Patrick, W.H., Jr (1980) Nitrogen and phosphorus distribution and utilization by Spartina alterniflora in a Louisiana Gulf Coast marsh. Estuaries 3, 111-121.
Chalmers, A.G. (1979) The effects of fertilization on nitrogen distribution in a Spartina alterniflora salt marsh. Estuar. Coastal Shelf Sci. 8, 327-337. .
Chalmers, A.G. (1982) Soil dynamics and the productivity of Spartina alterniflora. In: Kennedy, V.S. (Ed.) Estuarine Comparisons, pp. 231-241. Academic Press, New York.
Costanza, R., and Sklar, F.H. (1985) Articulation, accuracy, and effectiveness of mathematical models: a review of freshwater wetland applications. Ecol. Modelling 27, 45-68.
de la Cruz, A.A., Hackney, C.T., and Stout, J.P. (1981) Above ground net primary productivity of three Gulf Coast marsh macrophytes in artificially fertilized plots. In: Nielson, B.J., and Cronin, L.E. (Eds.) Estuaries and Nutrients, pp. 437-445. Humana Press, Clifton, New Jersey.
Erwin, K. (1989) Wetland evaluation for restoration and creation. In: Kusler, J., and Kentula, M. (Eds.) Wetland Creation and Restoration: The Status of the Science, pp. 15-46. Report No. EPA/600/3-89/038. US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Ewel, K.C. (1976) Effects of sewage effluent on ecosystem dynamics in cypress domes. In: Tilton, D.L., Kadlec, R.H., and Richardson, C.J. (Eds.) Freshwater Wetlands and Sewage Effluent Disposal, pp. 169-195. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Fetter, C.W., Jr. C.W., Sloey, W.E., and Spangler, F.L. (1978) Use of a natural marsh for wastewater polishing. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 50, 290-307.
Giesy, J.P., Jr (Ed.) (1980) Microcosms in Ecological Research. DOE Symposium No.52. US Department of Energy, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory. Available from National Technical Information Service (NTIS), Springfield, Virginia 22161, as publication no. CONF-781101.
Godfrey, P.J., Kaynor, E.R., Pelczarski, S., and Benforado, J. (1985) Ecological Considerations in Wetlands Treatment of Municipal Wastewaters. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 474 pp.
Gosselink, J.G., and Baumann, R.H. (1980) Wetland inventories: wetland loss along the United States coast. Z Geomorphol., N.F. Suppl.-Bd. 34, 173-187.
Grice, G.D., and Reeve, M.R. (1982) Marine Mesocosms. Springer-Verlag, New York, 430 pp.
Haines, B.L., and Dunn, E.L. (1976) Growth and resource allocation responses of Spartina alterniflora Loisel. to three levels of NH4-N, Fe, and NaCl in solution culture. Botan. Gaz. 137, 224-230.
Haines, E.B. (1979) Growth dynamics of cordgrass, Spartina alterniflora Loisel. on control and sewage sludge fertilized plots in a Georgia salt marsh. Estuaries 2(1), 50-53.
Hellawell, J.M. (1986) Biological Indicators of Freshwater Pollution and Environmental Management. Elsevier, New York. 515 pp.
Hemond, H.F., and Benoit, J. (1988) Cumulative impacts on water quality functions of wetlands. Environ. Manage. 12(5), 639-653.
Henderson-Sellers, B. (1984) Engineering Limnology. Pitman, London, 356 pp.
Hopkinson, C.S., Jr and Day, J.W., Jr (1980) Modeling hydrology and eutrophication in a Louisiana swamp forest ecosystem. Environ. Manage. 4, 325-335.
Johnston, C.A. (1991) Sediment and nutrient retention by freshwater wetlands: Effects on surface water quality. CRC Crit. Rev. Environ. Control 21, 491-565.
Jorgensen, S.E. (1988) Modelling of wetlands. In: Marani, A. (Ed.) Advances in Environmental Modelling, pp. 535-543. Elsevier, New York.
Kadlec, R.H., and Hammer, D.E. (1988) Modelling nutrient behavior in wetlands. Ecol. Modelling 40, 37-66.
Kadlec, R.H., and Tilton, D.L. (1979) The use of freshwater wetlands as a tertiary wastewater treatment alternative. CRC Crit. Rev. Environ. Control 9, 185-212.
Karr, J.R. (1987) Biological monitoring and environmental assessment: a conceptual framework. Environ. Manage. 11, 249-255.
Kelly, J.R., and Harwell, M.A. (1989) Indicators of ecosystem response and recovery. In: Levin, S.A., Harwell, M.A., Kelly, J.R., and Kimball, K.D. (Eds.) Ecotoxicology: Problems and Approaches, pp. 9-35. Springer Verlag, New York.
Kitchens, W.M. (1979) Development of a saltmarsh microcosm. lnt. J. Environ. Studies 13, 109-118.
Lan, C., Chen, G., Li, L., and Wong, M.H. (1992) Use of cattails in treating wastewater from a Pb/zn mine. Environ. Manage. 16, 75-80.
Larsen, V.J., and Schierup, H.H. (1981) Macrophyte cycling of zinc, copper, lead, and cadmium in the littoral zone of a polluted and a non-polluted lake: seasonal changes in heavy metal content of above-ground biomass and decomposed leaves. Aquat. Bot. 9, 26-34.
Leibowitz, N.C., Squires, L., and Baker, J.P. (1991) Research Plan for Monitoring Wetland Ecosystems. Report No. EPA/600/3-91/010. US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon, 191 pp.
Linthurst, R.A., and Seneca, E.D. (1981) Aeration, nitrogen and salinity as determinants of Spartina alterniflora Loisel. growth response. Estuaries 4, 53-63.
McIntosh, A.W., Shephard, B.K., Mayes, R.A., Atchison, G.J., and Nelson, D.W. (1978) Some aspects of sediment distribution and macrophytes cycling of heavy metals in a contaminated lake. J. Environ. Qual. 7,301-305.
Mendelssohn, I.A. (1979) The influence of nitrogen level, form and application method on the growth response of Spartina alterniflora in North Carolina. Estuaries 2, 106-112.
Miller, P.C., Stoner, W.A., and Tieszen, L.L. (1976) A model of stand photosynthesis for the wet meadow tundra at Barrow, Alaska. Ecology 57, 411-430.
Miller, P.C., Oechel, W.C., Stoner, W.A., and Sveinbjornsson, B. (1978a) Simulation of CO2 uptake and water relations of four arctic bryophytes at Point Barrow, Alaska. Photosynthetica 12, 7-20.
Miller, P.C., Stoner, W.A., Tieszen, L.L., Allessio, M., McCown, B., Chapin, F.S., and Shaver, G. (1978b) A model of carbohydrate, nitrogen, and phosphorus allocation and growth in tundra production. In: Tieszen, L.L. (Ed.) Vegetation and Production Ecology of an Alaskan Arctic Tundra, pp. 577-598. Springer Verlag, New York.
Mitsch, W.J. (1976) Ecosystem modeling of waterhyacinth management in Lake Alice, Florida. Ecol. Modelling 2, 69-89.
Mitsch, W.J. (1983) Ecological models for management of freshwater wetlands. In: Jorgensen, S.E., and Mitsch, W.J. (Eds.) Application of Ecological Modeling in Environmental Management, Part B, pp. 283-310. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Mitsch, W.J. (1988a) Ecological engineering and ecotechnology with wetlands applications of systems approaches. In: Marani, A. (Ed.) Advances in Environmental Modelling, pp. 565-580. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Mitsch, W .J. (1988b ) Productivity-hydrology-nutrient models for forested wetlands. In: Mitsch, W.J., Straskraba, M., and Jorgensen, S.E. (Eds.) Wetland Modelling, pp. 115-132. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Mitsch, W.J., and Gosselink, J.G. (1986) Wetlands. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 539 pp.
Mitsch, W.J., and Reeder, B.C. (1992) Nutrient and hydrologic budgets of a Great Lakes coastal freshwater wetland during a drought year. Wetlands Ecol. Manage. 1, 211-222.
Mitsch, W.J., Day, J.W., Jr, Taylor, J.R., and Madden, C. (1982) Models of North American freshwater wetlands. Int. J. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 8, 109-140.
Mitsch, W.J., Taylor, J.R., Benson, K.B., and Hill, P.L., Jr (1983) Wetlands and coal surface mining in western Kentucky¾a regional impact assessment. Wetlands 3, 161-179.
Mitsch, W.J., Straskraba, M., and Jorgensen, S.E. (Eds.) (1988) Wetland Modelling. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Morris, J.T. (1988) Pathways and controls of the carbon cycle in salt marshes. In: Hook, D.D. et al. (Eds.) The Ecology and Management of Wetlands, pp. 497-510. Croom Helm, London.
Morris, J.T. (1991) Effects of nitrogen loading on wetland ecosystems with particular reference to atmospheric deposition. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22, 257-279.
Mouvet, C. (1985) The use of aquatic bryophytes to monitor heavy metals pollution of freshwaters as illustrated by case studies. Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol. 22, 2420-2425.
NRC (National Research Council) (1990) Managing Troubled Waters: The Role of Marine Environmental Monitoring. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 140 pp.
Nichols, D.S. (1983) Capacity of natural wetlands to remove nutrients from wastewater. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 55, 495-505.
Niethamner, K.R., Atkinson, R.D., Baskett, T.S., and Samson, F.B. (1985) Metals in riparian wildlife in the lead mining district of southeastern Missouri. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 14, 213-223.
Nixon, S.W., and Lee, V. (1986) Wetlands and Water Quality: A Regional Review of Recent Research in the United States on the Role of Freshwater and Saltwater Wetlands as Sources, Sinks and Transformers of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Various Heavy Metals. Technical Report Y -86-2 to US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. University of Rhode Island, Kingston. 229 pp.
Office of Technology Assessment (1984) Wetlands: Their Use and Regulation. Report No. OTA-O-206. US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, D.C., 208 pp.
Pait, A.S., DeSouza, A.E., and Farrow, D.R.G. (1992) Agricultural Pesticides in Coastal Areas: A National Summary. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Strategic Environmental Assessments Division, Rockville, Maryland, 112 pp.
Parsons, T.R., Maita, Y., and Lalli, C.M. (1984) A Manual of Chemical and Biological Methods for Seawater Analysis. Pergamon Press, New York, 173 pp.
Patrick, W.H., Jr, and DeLaune, R.D. (1976) Nitrogen and phosphorus utilization by Spartina alterniflora in a salt marsh in Barataria Bay, Louisiana. Estuar. Coastal Marine Sci. 4, 59-64.
Portier, R.J., and Meyers, S.P. (1982) Use of microcosms for analyses of stress-related factors in estuarine-wetland ecosystems.ln: Gopal, B., Turner, R.E., Wetzel, R.G., and Whigham, D.F. (Eds.) Wetlands Ecology and Management, pp. 375-387. National Institute of Ecology and International Scientific Publications. Lucknow Publishing, Lucknow, India.
Quinn, H.A., Tolson, J.P., Klein, C.J., Orlando, S.P., and Alexander, C. (1989) Strategic Assessment of Near Coastal Waters: Susceptibility and Status of Gulf of Mexico Estuaries to Nutrient Discharges. Summary Report. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Strategic Assessment Branch, Rockville, Maryland, 35 pp.
Roelofs, J.G.M., Schuurkes, J.A.A.R., and Smits, A.J.M. (1984) Impact of acidification and eutrophication on macrophyte communities in soft water. II. Experimental studies. Aquat. Bot. 18, 389-411.
Schierup, H.H., and Larsen, V.J. (1981) Macrophyte cycling of zinc, copper, lead and cadmium in the littoral zone of a polluted and a non-polluted lake. 1. Availability, uptake, and translocation of heavy metals in Phragmites australis. Aquat. Bot. 11, 197-210.
Schindler, D.W. (1987) Detecting ecosystem response to anthropogenic stress. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44, 6-25.
Schroeder, R.L. (1987) Community Models for Wildlife Impact Assessment: A Review of Concepts and Approaches. US Fish and Wildlife Service, National Ecology Center, Resource Evaluation and Modelling Section, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Schuurkes, J.A., Kok, C.J., and den Hartog, C. (1986) Ammonium and nitrate uptake by aquatic plants from poorly buffered and acidified waters. Aquat. Bot. 24, 131-146.
Shaver, G.R., and Chapin III, F.S. (1980) Response to fertilization by various plant growth forms in an Alaskan tundra: Nutrient accumulation and growth. Ecology 61(3), 662-675.
Simpson, R.L., Good, R.E., Walker, R., and Frasco, B.R. (1983) The role of Delaware River freshwater tidal wetlands in the retention of nutrients and heavy metals. J. Environ. Qual. 12(1), 41-48.
Sloey, W.E., Spangler, F.L., and Fetter, C.W., Jr (1978) Management of freshwater wetlands for nutrient assimilation. In: Good, R.E., Whigham, D.P., and Simpson, R.L. (Eds.) Freshwater Wetlands: Ecological Processes and Management Potential, pp. 321-340. Academic Press, New York.
Stanley, D.W. (1976) A carbon flow model of epipelic algal productivity in Alaskan tundra ponds. Ecology 57, 1034-1042.
Stanley, D.W. (1992) Historical Trends: Water Quality and Fisheries, Albemarle-Pamlico Sounds, with Emphasis on the Pamlico River Estuary. Report No. UNC-SG-92-04. University of North Carolina, Sea Grant College, Raleigh, 215 pp.
Straskraba, M., and Gnauck, A. (1985) Freshwater Ecosystems: Modeling and Simulation. Developments in Environmental Modeling, Vol. 8. Elsevier, New York, 309 pp.
Sullivan, M.J. (1981) Effects of canopy removal and nitrogen enrichment on a Distichlis spicata-edaphic diatom complex. Estuar. Coastal Shelf Sci. 13, 119-130.
Taylor, G.J., and Crowder, A.A. (1983) Accumulation of atmospherically deposited metals in wetland soils of Sudbury, Ontario. Water Air Soil Pollut. 19, 29-42.
Tiner, R.W. (1984) Wetlands of the United States: Current Status and Recent Trends. US Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory, Washington, D.C., 58 pp.
Turner, R.E., Forsythe, S.W., and Craig, N.J. (1981) Bottomland hardwood forest land resources of the southeastern United States. In: Clark, J.R., and Benforado, J. (Eds.) Wetlands of Bottomland Hardwood Forests, pp. 13-28. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Tyler, G. (1967) On the effect of phosphorus and nitrogen, supplied to Baltic shore-meadow vegetation. Bot. Notiser 120, 433-447.
USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (1979) Methods for Chemical Analyses of Water and Wastes. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
Valiela, I., and Teal, J.M. (1974) Nutrient limitation in salt marsh vegetation. In: Reimold, R.J., and Queen, W .H. (Eds.) Ecology of Halophytes, pp. 543-565. Academic Press, New York.
Valiela, I., Teal, J.M., and Sass, W.J. (1975) Production and dynamics of salt marsh vegetation and the effects of experimental treatment with sewage sludge. J. Appl. Ecol. 12, 973-981.
Valiela, I., Teal, J.M., and Persson, N.Y. (1976) Production and dynamics of experimentally enriched salt marsh vegetation: below-ground biomass. Limnol. Oceanogr. 21, 245-252.
Valiela, I., Teal, J.M., Cog swell, C., Hartman, J., Allen, S., Van Et ten, R., and Goehringer, D. (1985) Some long-term consequences of sewage contamination in salt marsh ecosystems. In: Godfrey, P.J., Kaynor, E.R., Pelczarski, S., and Benforada, J. (Eds.) Ecological Considerations in Wetland Treatment of Municipal Waste Waters, pp. 301-316. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Van Raalte, C.D., Valiela, I., and Teal, J.M. (1976) The effect of fertilization on the species composition of salt marsh diatoms. Water Res. 10, 1-4.
Vermer, J.G. (1986) The effect of nutrients on shoot biomass and species composition of wetland and hayfield communities. Acta Ecol. Acta Plant. 7, 31-41.
Welcomme, R.L. (1979) Fisheries Ecology of Floodplain Rivers. Longman, New York, 318 pp.
Wiegert, R.G., Christian, R.R., and Wetzel, R.L. (1981) A model view of the marsh. In: Pomeroy, L.R., and Wiegert, R.G. (Eds.) The Ecology of a Salt Marsh, pp. 183-218. Springer Verlag, New York.
Windom, H.L. (1977) Ability of Salt Marshes to Remove Nutrients and Heavy Metals from Dredged Material Disposal Area Effluents. Technical Report D-77-37. US Army Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
Woods, R.D. (1975) Hydrobotanical Methods. University Park Press, Baltimore. 173 pp.
|
|
|
The electronic version of this publication has been
prepared at |